Like the real thing: reads every request, refers it to the right specialist — one expert, a panel that deliberates, or a full mission with gates — and keeps the record of everything. It never pretends to be the expert; it knows who is.
“What can you do?” “Where's my last run?” — a direct answer, no routing.
Summarize, tighten, translate, fact-check — quality-checked before it lands; some show a proposal you accept or reject.
A card names the destination, the alternatives and the scores. Confirm, and Decide or Deliver opens with your context.
Honestly. The deliberate last resort — never a forced match.
@mention bounds — the Chief of Staff steps aside.
@regulatory_strategist what are the top risks for our EU MDR Class IIb submission? — no recommendation card.
Two is the edge. Add a third for a panel, or pick the stronger fit.
Each contribution attributed; members analyze independently or challenge each other. The synthesis preserves dissent.
Or ask a panel for a produced deliverable — either escalates to Deliver, with gates.
Turn on knowledge, web or a connector and it cites what it used — and saves the fetched material to an Evidence & Sources page under your work.
Your private thread with a specialist, and a panel's deliberation across the workspace — a second panel starts warmer.
You always know what you commissioned, from whom, and at what price — before it ran.
It never pretends to be the expert. It knows who is.
The answer itself comes from the expert — that's the part worth paying for. The Chief of Staff reads the request, finds the honest match, states the reason and the price, and keeps the record.
Skeptics make the best reviewers — and reviewers are who we built this for. Put the first record on your own work.